Recently an article about a couple in Toronto that have chosen to keep the sex of their baby a secret went viral. The couple wishes to raise the child in a manner that is free from conventional gender norms. The parents Kathy and David Stocker named their newest child Storm. They are being accused by other people of using their children as social experiments.
The couple argues that breaking social norms is not associated with bad parenting. Their philosophy is that their children should be able to do what they want, they stated "What we noticed is that parents make so many choices for their children. It’s obnoxious" This couple is stirring up lots of controversy with their recent press statements. Many people are opposed to the idea of children having so much control over their lives at such a young age.
The Stockers are taking a very unique approach to parenting their children. It is causing people from all over the country to question how they raise their children. I think letting kids do whatever they want at such a young age can be destructive. The minds of children are very pliable, if children are not taught by their parents what to do, they will simply adopt the decisions of those around them instead.
Jon's Eclectic Episodes
the only correct opinion on world events
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Toronto couple attempting to raise "genderless" child
Thursday, May 26, 2011
Taxpayer money slaughtered as well as a couple of sled dogs
An issue that has been generating a large amount of public outcry has been the killings of the Whistler sled dogs. About 100 dogs were killed inhumanely at Outdoor Adventures in Whistler. The SPCA is launching a full scale investigation that could end up costing more than $225,000. Why there is a need for an investigation I am unsure. The owner of the sled dog company admitted as to how the animals were killed.
It is important to note that the sled dog company did bring in a veterinarian to humanely euthanize the dogs, but the vet refused to kill healthy dogs. The BC SPCA somehow managed to get $100,000 from the BC government to fight animal cruelty, but will be using the money to perform autopsies on these dogs. Fighting cruelty toward animals is an important thing. But something that is more important is fighting cruelty towards taxpayers dollars. This is a gross misuse of $100,000. Using this large amount of money on animal autopsies for one incident is ridiculous. That money could have been spent on autopsies on murdered people to solve murderer,s and catch real criminals. So remember to donate to the SPCA, but only if you value the life of animals over the life of humans...
It is important to note that the sled dog company did bring in a veterinarian to humanely euthanize the dogs, but the vet refused to kill healthy dogs. The BC SPCA somehow managed to get $100,000 from the BC government to fight animal cruelty, but will be using the money to perform autopsies on these dogs. Fighting cruelty toward animals is an important thing. But something that is more important is fighting cruelty towards taxpayers dollars. This is a gross misuse of $100,000. Using this large amount of money on animal autopsies for one incident is ridiculous. That money could have been spent on autopsies on murdered people to solve murderer,s and catch real criminals. So remember to donate to the SPCA, but only if you value the life of animals over the life of humans...
School District Of Burnaby Gay-Positive Policy
students protesting in support of the draft |
I would like to start off by saying that there are a lot of good points in this policy. Anything that helps protect the rights of students and teachers is a good thing. However, protection for minority groups is already worked into the school code of conduct. A policy like this is only going to estrange this specific minority from the rest. Everyone deserves to be treated with respect. If the school district puts this policy into effect are they saying that the LGBTQ population is more important than the other minorities. What is next? The school district is going to have to introduce policies to support nerds and kids with glasses too.
Thursday, March 10, 2011
Response to an important question
In a social justice class about a month ago the class was asked to write a response to the following question "Why is it that people are more likely to respond to the indiscriminate killings of animals than to the indiscriminate killing of people?" Here is my response to this question.
It is easier for people to look past the real issues in the world. People don't want to hear about child poverty, child labor camps, genocide and war. They would rather focus their attention on abandoned puppies and baby seals. Don't get me wrong, animal conservation is an important to a degree, but it is not important enough to distract people from the real, serious world issues. It is appalling and disgusting to think that someone would value the life of an animal more than that of a human. On a worldly scale, the slaughter of dogs, cats and other animals is completely insignificant. Next time you think about donating to the SPCA, DON'T! Donate to people who are actually in need.
It is easier for people to look past the real issues in the world. People don't want to hear about child poverty, child labor camps, genocide and war. They would rather focus their attention on abandoned puppies and baby seals. Don't get me wrong, animal conservation is an important to a degree, but it is not important enough to distract people from the real, serious world issues. It is appalling and disgusting to think that someone would value the life of an animal more than that of a human. On a worldly scale, the slaughter of dogs, cats and other animals is completely insignificant. Next time you think about donating to the SPCA, DON'T! Donate to people who are actually in need.
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
Egypt deprives residents of internet
When the Egyptian government realized that internet sites like facebook and twitter were being used to coordinate protests in Cairo, they ordered the shutdown of all ISP's (internet service providers) within the country. It took only four days for the Egyptian people to be entirely cutoff from the net. The ability for people to peacefully protest is a right and can not be infringed upon by the Egyptian government. The internet is a service that people pay for, and should not be allowed to be cut off so easily. This ridiculous attempt by the Egyptian government to silence people is only causing the people of the middle eastern country to become more and more angry.
When a government tries to limit free speech it immediately becomes a social justice issue. What concerns me the most is the willingness of Egyptian ISP's to cut off internet to their customers. When Hosni Mubarak (current Egyptian president) is kicked out of office, I hope he can provide a reasonable explanation to why he thinks he can take away the rights of the Egyptian people.
30 years in power causes Egyptian unrest
Egyptian protesters clash with riot police |
So why did hundreds of thousands of Egyptians start protesting all of a sudden? In the nearby country Tunisia, a man lit himself on fire because it was impossible for him to find work. This sparked massive protests in Tunisia and the Tunisian government was overthrown. Egyptians were inspired by the Tuniasian protests and decided to take action against the oppressive Egyptian government.
The current President of Egypt (Hosni Mubarak) is 82 years of age and has been in power for 30 years. It is not possible for one man to be in complete control of a country for 30 years and still retain the interests of the people. The Egyptians will keep protesting and fighting against the government until the President steps down. As of today despite the army shutting down the trains, over one million Egyptians march to overthrow the President.
It is completely ridiculous that one man has been in power for 30 years. He is not longer looking to the interests of the people, he only cares for his own self preservation. I sincerely hope that the Egyptian President is brought to justice and that democracy will be brought to Egypt.
Monday, November 22, 2010
Hundreds killed by human stampede in Cambodia
people panicking during the stampede |
All of a sudden people were desperately trying to get off the bridge, people who tripped and fell were trampled and killed. An estimated 340 people were killed and 410 people injured. This is truly a tragic event not only for the people of Cambodia, but for the families of foreigners who were killed.
When countries hold an event that attracts thousands upon thousands of people to a small area, the local government should be responsible for the safety and security of these people. In this case, Cambodia should have put measures in place to protect the festival goers from piling up on bottlenecks such as bridges. I am not exactly sure how this could have been accomplished. Instead of spending loads of money on identifying dead bodies, they should spend their money on preventative measures.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)